all my esteemed readers, I wish a happy new year in a successful new year 2010. May you be blessed with health, happiness and long life! I wish our politicians that they can forget their egos, the lobbyists who besieged the ministries like a swarm of rats, a corpse, come into their fat asses and finally sanity! Get your act on the belt and save our world to live for our children and grandchildren's sake, have a fucking right to be in a clean and healthy environment!
Who actually says, except economists and economists that the world at the mercy of corporations do? Why a business is only successful if it continues to grow, although everyone knows, or could know that endless growth is not at all possible, for obvious reasons? Nevertheless, corporations are only "profitable" as they grow. Is that not because of marketing, or other measures, then the competitors will be bought to take over their children. They grow and expand from more accessible and perish. Then connect to other companies and do exactly the same mistakes because nobody is willing to learn from past mistakes. At the universities is still the Maehr of limitless economic growth, marketing and market penetration taught, because they seem to still have not realized that there must be an economy to the growth illusion.
But where will the ideas come from, if each group is only concerned about expansion? Will it really easy the whole economy go to the wall, if you completely by surprise, and above all is suddenly finds that there is no more oil? Why is still hell-bent on globalized, although it was recognized long ago that this will lead the world into the abyss? The only winners here are the multinational corporations that consider both the resources as their private property, and the human resource regarded as an arbitrarily manipulable mass that has an existence only by permission, because they are needed as workers, or not at will and therefore can be geheuert and fired!
course still go all assume that corporations are required to produce all kinds of goods in large quantities and sell them to consumers cheaply. Finally, we learned it so and it is so used. The companies produce goods they sell "cheap" without the consequences of their production and the products themselves are responsible. That is, the corporations pull plug in the purchase price, from the cost of raw materials and labor wages and distribute the profit to the management and shareholders. The consumer is pleased about an alleged bargain and if at some point (sooner rather than later, for a durable product can not be in the interests of the corporations if - as we now know - to ever-increasing sales figures are dependent) breaks down, or simply comes only out of fashion, it flies in the trash. Whether it's here now rotted away, or - because it is made of plastic - and damages the environment, animals devoured, responsible for a painful death is interested no one. Least of all the managers of the group, from its factory buildings, it came from. If it's sold at first, is also the responsibility for the impact on the environment and flora and fauna are no longer with the group. In any case, according to the companies! The result can be seen for several years and decades increasingly evident everywhere. Huge, ever-growing landfills that threaten groundwater (the insanely expensive measures that are necessary to seal such a landfill and to prevent the emerging toxins into groundwater take, not the companies that produced these products. borne by the taxpayers, regardless of whether he has bought the products and / or used). The companies also deliver poisons, fertilizers, insecticides, pesticides, herbicides and fungicides, so that industrial agriculture may treat the crops in the fields so that they really need not to the extent, if not the seed, from the groups would (because they sprayed the fields and fields without mercy and without rhyme or reason with chemicals, toxins enter the course in the environment, into the groundwater and into the air and endanger humans, nature and animal).
But because it's not all, is a tremendous use of energy and heavy equipment necessary to thrive because without this no longer use the unit types in the fields. Therefore, the companies also strive for the patenting of seeds and living organisms (even today there are only domestic animals such as pigs, cattle and sheep, but soon maybe people already?), so that they could exercise control over the people and put the government under pressure. All about the filthy lucre's sake! So the oil resources are exploited, oppressed countries and peoples, extorted and abused. The energy companies emphasize fabulous profits and try to develop alternative energy sources to hinder. Thus, while remains of CO2 is pumped into the air, because you look at the burning of fossil fuels in large centralized power plants as the only means of energy production, our climate is going to the dogs, dried up all the States and drink groups of islands and coastal areas under the rising sea off!
These are just a few examples of that mean that capitalism, the economy and the corporations for this world and mankind, what they have consequences that we are now trying to dominate, while the perpetrators are not used for the sequences ( at least not within reasonable limits), nor can anyone to stop them, our world by their greed to give completely the rest!
Which approach will find the principles of permaculture? Now, it's actually quite simple and is called "self control"! However, this is not a thing that pushes to the markets today ide dominant large corporations to listen. For self-limiting means to consciously avoid constant growth and modesty lay at the day. This can only work if you create the corporations shackles that prevent them to do business exclusively for their own good. These bonds, the state must impose the conglomerates, which is not to be expected. Because politics and economics are now so interrelated that independent decisions are expected by the policy in favor of the people!
We see it abundantly clear that it requires enormous pressure from citizens to force the policy to an action that the needs of the environment and human exposure and not solely on the Needs of economic interest groups.
A first step would be the introduction of closed loop systems in the economy and their production processes, which are written to them to preserve the resources and resources already consumed by recycling back to win and that is 100%. At the same time it is necessary to make production processes so that there are no negative effects on the environment! If such action by the legislature threatens the economy responds in most cases very quickly with a "voluntary agreement" (which is nothing more than an attempt to avoid legal requirements from the outset and then not to their own "voluntary commitments" keep!) at hand.
We as consumers to corporations thereby cause damage by not buying from them. Let us, instead of in the supermarket, the organic farmers in the area and shower us with food, of which we know they are not burdened with genetic engineering. We refuse to McDoof or to choke king to go there and devour hamburgers that come from animals that are kept on pastures that have been obtained by burning the rain forest! We drive small cars when it already needs to be. Who thresh as a technical extension of his penis a Porsche Cayenne S / Turbo to the bakery or vending needs, is a poor sausage. But only to compensate for the declining power, there are certainly other options than to burn 30 liters of Super Plus per 100 kilometers! We need to rethink
and we must do our opinions. We have to shop there, where we can be sure that the products we buy and consume are produced ecologically sustainable. Quality has its price, a clean and healthy natural environment - they are priceless! We have to stop to buy this whole damn plastic crap that is being offered. The coronation of the plastic bottles in which beverages are sold and to which one does pledge to them a "recycling" to feed. This recycling is exhausted then a melting of the plastic bottles and their incorporation in the manufacture of any of inferior products. We must set the policy under pressure until they can not help but to fulfill the will of the people!
No one has the right to plunder the resources of the earth and pocket the profits for it, but imposing the protection of our livelihoods, the cost of his actions to the public. Privatize profits and socialize losses and costs, that is not in the sense of a just social order. It's wrong that we can not accept! We must deny this consumer society!
Everybody can contribute by itself in everything he does, or buy, consider whether and to what extent that is ecologically sound. Everyone needs to think about how we can preserve our environment. For each of us has his personal conduct and personal responsibility for the influence he exerts on his environment and nature!
links:
GLOBAL ELITE MEETS IN DC
The members of the Trilateral Commission do not want suffering U.S. taxpayers and squeeze even more money
[freely translated from http://www.propagandaschock.blogspot.com ]
The Trilateral Commission - one of the three largest and most powerful global groups in the world - held on 25 to 28 April, a meeting behind closed doors in Washington DC. True-to-rule, the members of the media who knew about the meeting notice - or even participants in the events were - refused to talk about what went right or at the meeting to report on the participants. Fortunately, the editor of American Free Press, Jim Tucker, to blow the whistle on the ground to complete this secret conversation.
top people at the meeting of the Trilateral Commission in Washington reported their satisfaction at the fact that they include all three major presidential candidates who, despite political posturing, the sovereignty be supplying measures such as NAFTA and will support the "North American Union".
"John has always supported free trade, even as he spoke to union leaders during the campaign," said one. "Hil and Barack pretend to be unhappy about some things, but that's just political posturing. They are absolutely for it. "
He referred to the Senators John McCain (Arizona), Hillary Clinton (New York) and Barack Obama (Illinois).
Mrs. Clinton, they noted, held strategy meetings as First Lady, how to get NAFTA "without change" by Congress. As president, they agreed they would "put icing on the cake on it" just that.
The candidate Obama has media reports on Canada did not dispute that his top economic adviser, Austan Goolsbee, assured Canadian diplomats, the senator would leave NAFTA into force and its manifestations against the trade agreement was nothing but "Wahlkampfrethorik.
SHOCKED BY RON PAUL
While they are confident that with any "potential president," clearly do well, testified that Trilateralists Ron Paul important acknowledgment with the same great approach of irony, by expressing their concern that he is a "significant Damage to the future sideboard.
They expressed their concern that Paul's numerous campaigns have attracted young men who just got "their political education." They want the Republicans to force Paul to get out and he will stop his education rallies. This order was given to Thomas Foley, former speaker of the U.S. House.
The reason why Paul's "education campaign" fear in the hearts of the Trilateral Commission raises is obvious. Paul would refuse to cede even a piece of U.S. sovereignty to an international organization and the Trilateral Commission (TC) wants world government.
Paul would bring the U.S. troops immediately from Iraq, Afghanistan and from 130 UN "peacekeeping" missions around the world home. TC wants to enjoy the profits of war and global power. Paul would abolish the federal income tax during TC a global tax that is paid to sit on the UN wants.
The formal agenda was filled with everything Paul and American patriots abhor: Among other things, higher taxes, more gifts to foreign countries, more legal and illegal immigration to the U.S. and the Employment of Iran. "
AMERICA MUST PAY ITS FAIR SHARE?
The Trilateral sat down on Sunday, 26.04. right to work with a top-class participants in the discussion forum with the name "U.S. foreign and domestic policy: Rough outline for a new government" together.
chaired by the journalist pimp David Gergen, who writes in his magazine, U.S. News and World Report, non-TC. Kenneth Duberstein, former White House chief of staff for President Ronald Reagan, Strobe Talbot, president of the Brookings Institution and former deputy foreign minister, and Joseph Nye, former Assistant Minister of Defence, took part as well. Henry Kissinger, former foreign minister and long time leader in one of the Bilderbergers, was listed as a participant and available. A member of the TC staff emphasized by its name, however. Some speculated he had problems with his neck.
This Forum had the following instructions for the next president: increase foreign aid across the board because "America does not pay its fair share," the payment of want to let the UN due residues that permit so many immigrants to the United States and come and "amnesty" for illegal immigrants already here.
Nothing was heard about the fact that American taxpayers pay one-fifth of the UN administrative costs and one-third the cost of 130 "peacekeeping missions" or the fact that Immigrants from South America, press the salaries here and average family of immigrants, the government thousands of dollars in social welfare, medical care and other "benefits" costs.
Robert Zoellick, President of the World Bank and other long-time Bilderberg boys repeated these views largely in a herzerweichendem "interview" another Journalistenhure, Lionel Barber, Redakteuer the Financial Times, will obediently report nothing.
combatting THE WARMING; PERMISSION OF IMMIGRATION
There were "subgroup" meetings on "climate change", "Water and Health" and "migration and development". Every nation, especially the U.S. should be a lot of money to spend on the "global warming" to fight, they agreed. The United States should spend more, "because America causing the greatest pollution," explained one. Americans should send more money to Africa so natives can drink clean water and wash themselves, they said.
Antonio Garrigues Walker, chairman of Garrigues Abogadas y Asesores Tributarios supported, Peter Sutherland, the process of the special envoy on migration and development of the UN Secretary-General, the United States to ask not only unlimited immigration permit, but Mexico and other impoverished Latin American countries to throw more money behind. It was kind of having their "right" number of U.S. dollars. Sutherland is chairman of British Petroleum and Goldman Sachs International. He is also a long-time leader of the Bilderbergers.
MEDIA LOCK
Another Journalistenhure, Bill Emmott, former editor of The Economist, speaking at a reception dinner at the Smithsonian Art Museum, the "rise of Asia", will report nothing.
It is Sunday morning, Robert Blackwill, former deputy national security adviser for Iraq, U.S., leads a discussion forum on "Employment of Iran and building peace in the Persian Gulf region." For the first time there was opposition. Blackwill tried to justify the Iraq invasion. Others doubted that Saddam Hussein's links to the 9-11 terrorist attacks, or had a nuclear threat was. Blackwill said the military option still exists, but he hoped that diplomatic efforts were successful.
Other participants were Ray Takeyh of the Council on Foreign Relations, which serves as propaganda ministry for TC and Bilderberg; Volker Perthes, Chairman of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs and Hitoshi Tanaka, former Deputy Foreign Minister of Japan.
MORE, MORE, MORE MONEY
Several foreign participants demanded more U.S. money at a food forum entitled "European and Asian views on U.S. foreign and security policy. " Participants were Elisabeth Guigou, a member of the French National Assembly and former minister for European affairs and Han Sung-joo, former foreign minister of South Korea.
An afternoon session addressed "global health" with more calls for U.S. taxpayers' money. One, who spoke for this particular Sylvia Mathews Burwell, was the president of the Global Development Program of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill Gates has at least attended a Bilderberg meeting.
EXCUSE FOR IRAQ, IRAN PLANS FOR
John Negroponte, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State spoke at the evening dinner on "foreign policy perspectives of the USA". Again, the invasion of Iraq justified and kept to an invasion of Iran as a possibility.
The finale on Monday morning was about the global financial crisis with the following top people: Robert Kimmitt, U.S. Deputy Treasurer, Martin Feldstein, former chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisors; David Rubenstein, managing director of Carlyle Group, Naoki Tanaka, president of the Center for International Public Policy Studies and Sir Andrew Crockett, president of JP Morgan Chase International.
Among them there were many discussions about the "duty" of the U.S. government "to intervene" in favor of "financial institutions under stress." Virtually nothing has been said hundreds of thousands of Americans who are losing their houses because they were lured by financial institutions to buy houses they can not afford.
got the whole weekend, no American voice for the needs of their country. Instead, there were smiling, nodding faces and applause.
The American Free Press Editor-James P. Tucker Jr. is a seasoned journalist, who spent many years as a member of the "elite" media in Washington. Since 1975 he has for his work and his on-site reports on the intrigues of global power blocs such as the Bilderberg group, has gained widespread attention. Tucker is the author of Jim Tucker's Bilderberg Diary, with numerous photographs - many of them previously unpublished. The book draws on Tucker's experiences over the last quarter century at Bilderberg meetings.
